For the purposes of the City's Ethics Ordinance , a person has a conflict of interest when it is reasonably foreseeable (i.e., a realistic possibility) that the outcome of a municipal decision will have a significant impact on his or her economic interests, and that impact is distinguishable from its effect on the public generally.
These rules exist to reinforce the public's confidence that City leaders are acting in the public's best interest, and not to further their own self-interests. City Officials may not generally use their official position to influence a municipal decision in which they have an economic interest. If a municipal decision will have a significant impact on an official's economic interests, and if that impact is not also felt by a significant segment of the public, then there is at least the appearance that the official is acting out of self-interest rather than acting in the public's interest. Conflict of interest rules require City Officials to withdraw from participating in municipal decisions when such decisions could impact their economic finances.
The answer to this question depends on how your particular set of facts fit into the City's and State's conflict laws. The City's Ethics Ordinance and the State's Political Reform Act both contain laws applicable to conflicts of interest. These laws can be complicated, and whether or not a particular law applies will depend on your specific factual situation. The questions that follow are ones you can ask yourself when faced with a potential conflict.
When evaluating the potential existence of a conflict of interest under the San Diego Ethics Ordinance, the first step involves determining whether or not you are considered a "City Official." For the purposes of the Ethics Ordinance, you are a "City Official" if you are required to file a Statement of Economic Interests pursuant to the California Political Reform Act of 1974, and are (1) an elected or appointed City officeholder; (2) a member of a City board, commission, committee, or task force; (3) an unclassified City employee; or (4) a consultant of the City.
The second step in the process involves deciding if you are engaging in the kind of conduct regulated by the Ethics Ordinance's conflict of interest rules. The Ethics Ordinance's conflict of interest rules apply when you (1) make a governmental decision (e.g., a Planning Commissioner casting a vote during a meeting); (2) participate in making a governmental decision (e.g., giving advice or making recommendations to the decision-maker); or (3) influence a governmental decision by communicating with the decisionmaker. A good rule of thumb for deciding whether your actions constitute making, participating in making, or influencing a governmental decision is to ask yourself if you are exercising discretion or judgment with regard to the decision. If the answer is "yes," then your conduct with regard to the decision is probably covered.
In this step, you must identify the possible sources of a financial conflict of interest. Conflict of interest provisions apply only to conflicts of interest arising from economic interests. The Ethics Ordinance, at section 27.3561, identifies six specific kinds of economic interests from which conflicts of interest can arise for City Officials:
(1) Business Investment. You have an economic interest in a business entity in which you, your spouse, or your dependent children have invested $2,000 or more.
(2) Business Employment or Management. You have an economic interest in a business entity for which you or a member of your family is a director, officer, partner, trustee, employee, or hold any position of management.
(3) Real Property. You have an economic interest in real property in which you, your spouse, your dependent children or anyone acting on your behalf has invested $2,000 or more.
(4) Sources of Income. You have an economic interest in anyone, whether an individual or an organization, from whom you or a member of your immediate family has received (or by whom you have been promised) $500 or more in income within twelve months prior to the making of a related municipal decision.
(5) Gifts. You have an economic interest in anyone, whether an individual or an organization, from whom you or a member of your immediate family has received gifts which total $500 or more within twelve months prior to the making of a related municipal decision.
(6) Personal Financial Effect. You have an economic interest in your personal expenses, income, assets, or liabilities, and those of your immediate family.
If the specific provisions of the foregoing six kinds of economic interests do not apply, you must still consider the general rule: It is unlawful for a City Official to knowingly influence a municipal decision if it is reasonably foreseeable that the municipal decision will have a material financial effect on the City Official or a member of his or her immediate family, if the material financial effect is distinguishable from its effect on the public generally.
At the heart of deciding if you have a conflict of interest is whether or not it is reasonably foreseeable that the municipal decision will have a "material financial effect" on your economic interests. The Ethics Ordinance has incorporated regulations adopted by the Fair Political Practices Commission that contain detailed rules for determining whether a financial effect is material. In general these rules focus on whether an economic interest is the subject of the decision or would otherwise be financially impacted by that decision. In some cases, the analysis depends on whether the public official knows or has reason to know that a decision will financially impact his or her economic interest. Review the Ethics Commission's disqualification fact sheets for additional guidance.
Yes. The City of San Diego has adopted a conflict of interest law that is even more stringent than what is contained in the State's conflict laws. City law prohibits City Officials from participating in a municipal decision in instances where a party to the municipal decision has given the City Official, promised to give the City Official, or acted as an intermediary for the City Official to have, an opportunity for earning or obtaining money or other financial benefits. This law prevents a City Official from being involved in a municipal decision even if the official doesn't have one of the economic interests listed above. The purpose behind this law stems from the public's interest in preventing City Officials from being improperly influenced by being given special opportunities, not available to the general public, for financial reward.
Opportunities for compensation provided to a City Official include opportunities for compensation provided to the City Official's immediate family (an individual's spouse and dependent children). When such an opportunity for compensation is provided to a member of the City Official's immediate family, the City Official is prohibited from participating in a municipal decision involving a party to the municipal decision unless the City Official had no knowledge of, or involvement in, securing the opportunity for compensation.
Not all conflicts of interest prevent you from lawfully taking part in the municipal decision at hand. Even if you otherwise have a conflict of interest, you are not disqualified from the decision if the "public generally" exception applies. This exception exists because you are less likely to be biased by a financial impact when a significant part of the community is going to feel essentially the same impact from a governmental decision that your economic interests are likely to feel. If you can show that a significant segment of your jurisdiction feels a financial impact which is substantially similar to the impact on your economic interest, then the exception applies. The "public generally" exception must be considered with care. You may not assume that it applies without considering relevant facts. There are specific rules for identifying the specific segments of the general population with which you may compare your economic interest, and specific rules for deciding whether the financial impact is substantially similar. Contact the Ethics Commission or the FPPC for advice and details.
In certain rare circumstances, you may be called upon to take part in a decision despite the fact that you have a disqualifying conflict of interest. This "legally required participation" rule applies only in certain very specific circumstances in which the City would be paralyzed and unable to act without your participation. You are strongly encouraged to seek advice from the Ethics Commission or the FPPC before you act under this rule.
When the "municipal decision" involves a City contract, stricter laws are involved. These laws mandate that City bodies may make contracts only if their members are free of influences that could interfere with their loyalty to the public. Under the City's "Financial Interest in Contracts" law:
(1) It is unlawful for any City Official to be financially interested in any contract made by him or her in an official capacity; and,
(2) It is unlawful for any contract to be made by the City Council or any City board or commission if any individual member of the body has a financial interest in the contract.
This law applies if any member of the City body involved with making a contract has a financial interest in that contract. Financial interests are interests that prevent a City Official from exercising absolute loyalty and undivided allegiance to the best interests of the City. Unlike other municipal decisions where the refusal of a person with a financial interest allows the rest of the decision making body to proceed with a matter, refusal has no effect when the matter involves a contract. If it is determined that a member had a financial interest in a contract, the contract is void even if that member did not vote or participate in the decision to make the contract.
The City Council or any City board or commission may involve itself in making a contract if the financial interest of one of its members does not rise to anything more than a "remote interest" or a "non-interest." The City of San Diego has incorporated into its Ethics Ordinance the State's definition of a "remote interest" as set forth in California Government Code section 1091, and the State's definition of "non-interest" as set forth in California Government Code section 1091.5. If a City Official has a remote interest in a prospective contract of the City, and that official sits on a body that is involved with the contract, then that official must disclose the existence of the remote interest to the body, and the City Official must abstain from influencing or participating in the creation, negotiation, review, and approval of the contract.
If you have questions regarding a particular set of facts and wish to obtain prospective advice from the Ethics Commission, please ask for formal or informal advice. Formal written advice from the Ethics Commission, based upon accurate and complete facts, may provide you with immunity from an enforcement action initiated by the Ethics Commission and is evidence of good faith in any other proceeding if you have relied upon the advice in good faith. Keep in mind that the Ethics Commission can provide you with immunity only if you seek advice before you participate in a municipal decision.