Community Planning Group Recommendations for Development Projects

681648

Pacific Beach

Approve: 8-1-3

Reasons given for those abstaining: would like more information on the project, in particular, what rate the units will be rented for and what rate the units may be listed for. Presenter did not have that information available.

September 8, 2021

678857

Miramar Ranch North

Deny: 3-6-

Since the beginning of this project, the MRNPC has repeatedly requested the applicant to conduct public input session/workshop for this project. To no avail, we asked the developer to consider mitigating for its proposed significant impacts to public facilties & infrastructures associated with this project. Ex. Improve existing adjacent Spring Canyon Neighborhood Park which will be used by the future residents of this proposed mutli-residential development.

N/A

September 7, 2021

685412

North Park

Approve with Conditions: 9-0-2

To approve PTS 685412 (CVS CUP request) with modification to the CUP conditions to stop selling alcohol after 11pm, and additional requirements to post a visible complaint number, daily litter pick-up procedure and weekly side walk power washing around entire perimeter.

August 17, 2021

678621

Pacific Beach

Deny: 9-2-

The owner's attendance was requested at this meeting but was absent again. Jason Smith, architect, addressed the committee. Board members expressed concern that the developer is not being honest about the true intentions of the development. Concerns were that this single ADU could be easily split into two units, noting the surplus of doors and bathrooms in the upper unit including a "mud room" at the far end of the external walkway on the second level with a separate entry. There was also concern that the lower level "addition" is designed to be locked off from the primary unit and rented separately. There was concern that three total parking spaces was insufficient for the number of bedrooms on the property. There was significant community opposition as well which, in addition to the concerns expressed by the board, also noted that the primary unit is not owner-occupied and that this development could easily be converted into 3-4 separate units as a "mini-dorm" or three separate Airbnb-style vacation rentals. Board members and community members also expressed their strong belief that the project massing, character and design of this ADU project was was inappropriate for this particular location.

August 11, 2021

669397

Pacific Beach

Approve: 7-5-1

Supporters viewed this as a well-designed project and possible role model for integrating ADU and jADUs into neighborhoods that were previously zoned for single family dwellings only. Detractors cited lack of parking and insufficient enforcement for possible noise level infractions from outdoor activities on roof decks.

August 11, 2021