Skip to main content

City Planning Department

Community Planning Group Recommendations for Development Projects


AT&T Small Cell Site

Project Number:

679945


Community:

Downtown


Vote:

Deny: 13-1-1


Conditions or Recommendations:

DCPC suggest city look seriously at replacing existing poles for shared utilization providing for next Internet of Things and next generation downtown. Motion supported by Jim / AT&T without delays that may result from RFP process. Friendly Amendment (Eddy) to advise city to also consider third party pole company, eg Crown Castle, to build pole and lease to carriers with priority being not add new poles per carrier. Kennedy confirmed third party would be acceptable, using existing infrastructure when available and adequate.


Distribution Date:


BOSA Development Agreement

Project Number:

691185


Community:

Downtown


Vote:

Approve: 14-0-0


Conditions or Recommendations:


Distribution Date:


Via De La Valle

Project Number:

529748


Community:

Carmel Valley


Vote:

Deny: 10-0-0


Conditions or Recommendations:

The most important issue for denial of the project focused on the lack of an acceptable solution for the ingress and egress for the project and the impact to Via de la Valle having a driveway cut along the busy street.


Distribution Date:


Sprint cell site modification, at 666 Upas St.

Project Number:

691449


Community:

Uptown


Vote:

Approve: 13-0-0


Conditions or Recommendations:

N/A


Distribution Date:


T-Mobile at 8350 Mira Mesa Blvd

Project Number:

678096


Community:

Mira Mesa


Vote:

Approve: 11-1-


Conditions or Recommendations:

We reviewed this project at the September 20, 2021 meeting of the Mira Mesa Community Planning Group and approved a motion to state that we think option 3 is prettier, but approve the project as proposed. The one "no" vote was because one member thought process 4 was overkill for a simple project like this.


Distribution Date:


Campus Point 2 NDP

Project Number:

651935


Community:

University


Vote:

Approve: 8-0-3


Conditions or Recommendations:

3 abstain = 1 abstain (competitor) + 2 recuse (conflict of interest)
The board enthusiastically supports the project as a model for development adjacent to MSCP and environmentally sensitive land and for the choices made in landscaping.


Distribution Date:


1420 & 1422 Pacific Beach Drive - Vesting Tentative Map

Project Number:

681648


Community:

Pacific Beach


Vote:

Approve: 8-1-3


Conditions or Recommendations:

Reasons given for those abstaining: would like more information on the project, in particular, what rate the units will be rented for and what rate the units may be listed for. Presenter did not have that information available.


Distribution Date:


965 & 967 Diamond Street - VTM

Project Number:

684900


Community:

Pacific Beach


Vote:

Approve: 10-2-1


Conditions or Recommendations:

Reasons given for member abstaining: would like more information on the project, in particular, historical context of the building, its owner/developer and other projects Developer owns or has built in the vicinity.


Distribution Date:


Scripps Mesa Apartments

Project Number:

678857


Community:

Miramar Ranch North


Vote:

Deny: 3-6-


Conditions or Recommendations:

Since the beginning of this project, the MRNPC has repeatedly requested the applicant to conduct public input session/workshop for this project. To no avail, we asked the developer to consider mitigating for its proposed significant impacts to public facilties & infrastructures associated with this project. Ex. Improve existing adjacent Spring Canyon Neighborhood Park which will be used by the future residents of this proposed mutli-residential development.


No Action Reason:

N/A


Distribution Date:


604 Palomar Ave. 684897

Project Number:

684897


Community:

La Jolla


Vote:

Approve: 14-0-1


Conditions or Recommendations:

Approved on Consent at regular Trustee meeting, 9/2/21


Distribution Date: